1503, was dubbed one of many knights of the sword, at the creation of Henry Prince of Wales, and was then in the best esteem. He was a very great buddy to and promoter of, the Revolution, and within the convention parliament, (being then knight of the shire for Norfolk,) he declared for the vacancy of the throne. Sir Henry Hobart, in 1682, who was elected a burgess for King’s-Lyn, in the parliament that met at Oxford in 1681, and sat with his father, who served there as knight of the shire for Norfolk. John, now Earl of Buckinghamshire, who was educated at Clarehall in Cambridge, and at his return from his travels was elected member for St. Ives in Cornwall, in the first parliament of George I. and in 1722, for a similar borough, as also for that of Beer-Alston in Devonshire; in that reign he was constituted one of many commissioners for trade and the plantations; and on the twenty seventh of May, 1725, was elected one of many knights companions of the most honourable Order of the Bath; on the accession of his present Majesty, he was made treasurer of the chamber, and chosen a knight of the shire for Norfolk, and burgess for Beer-Alston; and in May 1728 was advanced to the dignity of a baron of this realm, by the title of Lord Hobart, Baron Hobart of Blickling in the county of Norfolk; and in 1730 was constituted assay-grasp or, tryer of the tin, belonging to the Prince of Wales, by his Royal Highness; and on January 31, 1739, was sworn lord lieutenant of the county of Norfolk.
Earl of Buckinghamshire, (created August 20, 1746, 20 George II.) Baron Hobart of Blickling, (28 May, 1728, 1st George II.) and Baronet, (22 May 1611, 9 James I.) Captain of the Band of Gentlemen Pensioners to his Majesty, Lord Lieutenant and Custos Rotulorum, of the County of Norfolk, and Vice-Admiral of the same; one of many Lords of his Majesty’s most Honourable Privy Council, and one of many Knights Companion of essentially the most honourable Order of the Bath. Sir Milel Hobart, who was born at Plumstede, April 12, 1595, was knighted at Salisbury, by James I. August 8, 1623, and being a member in that parliament, which met March 17, 1627, he was remarkably diligent in opposing the designs of the Court, and was one of those members, who foreseeing the dissolution of it, on March 2, 1628, forcibly held the Speaker within the chair, whilst they published a protestation in the house declaring, 1, Who-ever shall herald innovation of religion, or by favour or countenance search to extend or introduce Popery or Arminianism, or other opinion disagreeing from the reality and orthodox church, shall be reputed a capital enemy to this kingdom and commonwealth.
Non morior, sed vivam; as to his being buried in the cathedral, I belive it is a mistake, the monument there being for the lawyer normal, James Hobart; I quite think he was interred at Blickling, which he bought of Sir Edward Clere. King at Blickling, the place he knighted his eldest son Henry. In 1590, 22d of April, he was married at Blickling, to Dorothy, daughter of Sir Robert Bell of Beaupre-Hall in Upwell, Knt. Sir Henry handed his sword by way of Neve’s arm, and Neve ran his into Sir Henry’s stomach, of which wound he died the subsequent day, being Sunday, 21 August, 1698, and was interred within the vault here; he married the eldest daughter and coheir of Joseph Maynard, Esq. Henry directly issued a proclamation and charter promising the redress of all of the grievances with which his brother had troubled his feudal tenants, the clergy and the whole nation. In any action or proceeding primarily based on any alleged unlawful employment follow, no particular person shall be topic to any legal responsibility or punishment for or on account of (1) the fee by such person of an unlawful employment practice if he pleads and proves that the act or omission complained of was in good faith, in conformity with, and in reliance on any written interpretation or opinion of the Commission, or (2) the failure of such particular person to publish and file any data required by any provision of this subchapter if he pleads and proves that he did not publish and file such info in good faith, in conformity with the instructions of the Commission issued under this subchapter concerning the filing of such information.